Twitter accused of censorship for suspending journalist Allison Pearson

A journalist today accused Twitter of suspending users for failing to toe the government line on Covid after she was locked out of her account for a post condemning the lockdown. 

Daily Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson was responding to a BBC article about the risk of coronavirus spreading in universities when she tweeted that she ‘wanted’ students to get the virus to ‘speed us towards herd immunity’. 

The author Lionel Shriver previously had an audio column about the importance of obesity rather than race in explaining Covid death statistics removed from YouTube because it ‘contradicted World Health Organisation guidance’. 

Pearson’s tweet led to her account being suspended for a day – despite her insisting this view reflected the opinions of scientists including Oxford’s Prof Sunetra Gupta and the Nobel Prize winner Prof Michael Levitt. 

The Government have been pressurising social media companies to tackle ‘false and misleading narratives’ about Covid, and through its Rapid Response Unit claims to have ‘resolved’ 70 such incidents a week.

This led some commentators to draw a line between Pearson’s experience and the wider Government drive against perceived misinformation, with Big Brother Watch accusing ministers of an ‘Orwellian’ effort to police legal speech.  

Daily Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson was responding to a BBC article about the risk of coronavirus spreading in universities when she tweeted that she ‘wanted’ students to get the virus to ‘speed us towards herd immunity’

How Lionel Shriver had her audio column removed from YouTube 

Lionel Shriver recently complained that a column she read out loud and posted onto YouTube was taken down for violating the site’s ‘community guidelines’. 

The Spectator columnist argued in the article that ethnic and racial disparities in Covid death rates were ‘overwhelmingly due to obesity’. 

But she was shocked when her spoken version was taken down by YouTube. 

Lionel Shriver writes for the Spectator 

Describing the experience in the Spectator on September 19, she wrote:  ‘The explanation was pro forma: the column violated the site’s opaque ‘community guidelines’. 

‘An appeal produced the further explanation: ‘YouTube does not allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts the World Health Organisation or local health authorities’ medical information about Covid-19, including on methods to prevent, treat, or diagnose Covid-19 and means of transmission of Covid-19. Learn more’.

‘Thus if I were to ‘learn more’ from YouTube, I would only be allowed to absorb information in lockstep with the government line.’ 

Advertisement

Pearson’s full tweet, posted on Monday, read: ‘How hard is it for people to understand? We WANT students to get the virus. They will speed us towards community immunity. It may not be very far off.’

By yesterday morning she had been locked out of her account, although it was restored 12 hours later and was live by today. 

After explaining what had happened she asked in the Telegraph: ‘Is it a coincidence that the Twitter algorithms, which put me on the Naughty Step for 12 hours, align so closely with government policy? 

‘Or is it that Lefties get to shut down any version of the truth but their own?’

The Government has been urging social media companies to step up their efforts to combat perceived misinformation about Covid. 

Its Rapid Response Unit, operating from within the Cabinet Office and No10, is involved in identifying ‘false narratives’ online and flagging these to social media companies to be resolved. 

Ministers insist this work is vital to ensure the public has access to proper medical advice to protect themselves and save lives. 

But today campaign group Big Brother Watch suggested the Unit – and Twitter’s suspension of Pearson – were both examples of a wider attempt to ‘censor’ freedom of expression around the virus. 

Its director, Silkie Carlo, said: ‘It’s an affront to fundamental rights for Twitter to censor people’s lawfully held opinions, however controversial or poorly worded. 

‘The pandemic makes freedom of expression, open debate and rebuttal more important, not less. Censorship has never aided science, only power. 

‘It’s a little known fact that a mysterious government ‘counter disinformation’ unit is pressuring social media companies to act as speech police online, silencing lawfully held opinions. It’s Orwellian in the extreme.’

Brexit Party chairman Richard Tice also criticised the Government’s initiative.  

He said: ‘There is an easy clear line between preventing criminal scams and preventing genuine debate by people.

‘Twitter have crossed this, quite possibly aided and abetted by the Government which is in thrall to Imperial College and clearly trying to shut down views from Oxford University related scientists. 

‘It is appalling and terrifying, what you expect in North Korea not Whitehall.’ 

The Government has been urging social media companies to step up their efforts to combat perceived misinformation about Covid. Boris Johnson is pictured today 

Meirion Jenkins, a Conservative councillor for Sutton Mere Green in Birmingham, called Twitter’s move ‘quite troubling’.  

‘Allison is obviously a very credible and high quality journalist. I agree with almost everything she says, but that’s not the point’ he said.

‘Whether you agree or disagree with what she says, restricting what she can tweet is quite unacceptable, especially given that her tweets are based on fact’.

‘It should be left to the good common sense of the British public to read the information that is available out there and then make up their own mind.’ 

Pearson’s criticism of the lockdown has been echoed by several leading scientists, including Professors Sunetra Gupta and Michael Levitt, who she referenced in her article.   

Both scientists have criticised the Government’s lockdown, with Prof Gupta arguing that restrictions weaken the immune system and leave people vulnerable to future pandemics.

Pearson’s criticism of the lockdown has been echoed by several leading scientists, including Professors Sunetra Gupta

The epidemiologist also released a study suggesting that coronavirus had arrived in the UK in December and caused a significant ‘herd immunity’ – rivalling official advice from Neil Ferguson of Imperial College that it could cause 500,000 deaths. 

Prof Levitt Stanford University chemist has also criticised lockdowns as driven by ‘panic’ and suggested the measures have cost more lives than they have saved. 

Pearson also attacked ministers for suggesting the rule of six could curb Christmas gatherings, saying it was ‘disgusting’ to claim the celebration ‘is their gift’. 

Social media platforms including Facebook, Twitter and Instagram have vowed to tackle Covid ‘misinformation’ posted during the pandemic. 

Facebook now sends myth-busting messages to users who have liked, reacted or commented on posts containing ‘harmful misinformation’ about the coronavirus.

Meanwhile, Twitter tags tweets containing disputed information – but insists it will only remove searches that are ‘harmful’. 

Twitter said: ‘We enforce the Twitter Rules judiciously and impartially for all account holders. When we identify any account that violates our rules, we will take enforcement action.’  

Prof Levitt Stanford University chemist has also criticised lockdowns as driven by ‘panic’ and suggested the measures have cost more lives than they have saved