The challenge of kicking Aileen Cannon off the Trump case

Donald Trump’s classified documents case is entering a crucial juncture, with U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon set to make important decisions on issues like access to classified material and protecting witness information. Given her behavior prior to and during the criminal case, the question arises whether she’ll be kicked off of it. At this point, it will be an uphill battle for special counsel Jack Smith if he tries to remove Cannon, but exactly how she handles upcoming rulings and how she comports herself generally matter.

It’s an uphill battle because the law on reassigning judges is tough. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Florida) has deemed reassignment appropriate “where the trial judge has engaged in conduct that gives rise to the appearance of impropriety or a lack of impartiality in the mind of a reasonable member of the public.” On its face, one might think from that language that Cannon shouldn’t be on the case. But she is on it — and might stay on it — because it’s not that simple.

To understand why, let’s consider the following passage from an 11th Circuit case over trafficking counterfeit Rolexes, United States v. Torkington, in which the appeals court ordered reassignment:

The judge in this case has been reversed once by this Court … and dismissed the case at the first opportunity by construing a motion for mistrial as a motion for entry of judgment of acquittal. The judge from the bench questioned the wisdom of the substantive law he had to apply and challenged the government’s decision to prosecute Torkington. For example, the judge stated at various times that he felt the taxpayer had little interest in this type of suit, that this prosecution was ‘silly,’ and that it was a waste of the taxpayers’ money. He also termed the prosecution a ‘vendetta’ by Rolex Watch against the defendant.

Now, you might be thinking: Wait, wasn’t Cannon already reversed twice by the circuit court? Yes, she was — badly — during litigation before Trump was charged. That’s what raised questions about the propriety of her handling this criminal case when it was assigned to her. And that history, combined with her handling of the case since, raises anew the question of whether the 11th Circuit would want a different judge to handle it. But comparing Trump’s case to Torkington leads to the question of whether the circuit court would distinguish it in Cannon’s favor, because her prior erroneous rulings technically came in a separate (albeit related) matter and because she hasn’t made the sort of comments called out in the Torkington case.

That doesn’t mean Cannon should be handling Trump’s case. Rather, it illustrates how the law makes it difficult to kick her off. Ultimately, whether she stays on is likely in her own hands: It’s not just a question of whether she makes incorrect rulings, but also whether she demonstrates an obvious bias, like the judge’s statements in that other case. Just being a bad judge isn’t enough.

And for anyone hoping for a different judge due to concerns over Cannon further delaying the case, assigning a new one could just add more delay. But if Trump loses the election and prosecutors are no longer racing that clock, then a more experienced judge could help ensure not only that the case moves toward trial efficiently but that the trial itself is handled properly, given the vast discretion afforded trial judges. Yet it’s that discretion — and the high bar for recusal and reassignment — that may keep Cannon on the case.

Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for weekly updates on the top legal stories, including news from the Supreme Court, the Donald Trump cases and more.