Sex addict doctor slept with multiple women at GP surgery and sent explicit videos
Slept #Slept
Cambridge-educated Thomas Plimmer, 40, said he suffers from a sex addiction after a tribunal heard he had intercourse at work while he should have been seeing patients
Doctor Thomas Plimmer slept with multiple women at his GP surgery before blaming it on a sex addiction (
Image: SWNS)
A doctor who slept with multiple women at his GP surgery has blamed his behaviour on a sex addiction.
Cambridge-educated Thomas Plimmer, 40, had regular sex sessions at work when he should have been treating patients, a tribunal heard.
The GP has now been found ‘guilty’ of several misconduct charges after facing accusations from half a dozen complainants, including one colleague who had claimed their weekly sex meetings at the practice in Swindon, Wiltshire, were ‘unwanted’ and sometimes forced.
The woman, referred to as Miss A, had told the tribunal she was ‘groomed’ into regular intercourse with Dr Plimmer at his surgery and said felt used as a ‘sex object’ to help his boredom.
It was also heard that he had sent explicit videos to her. Giving evidence at the Medical Practioners Tribunal, Dr Plimmer said all the acts were consensual – and argued the context of everything that took place was centred around his sex addiction. In their verdict on Thursday, the tribunal found the case against Dr Plimmer was “proved and determined” in relation to some of the counts and “not proven” in relation to others. Dr Plimmer will now face a further hearing in April next year to determine his punishment.
In what the chair Claire Lindley described as a “complicated outcome,” the tribunal ruled he sent unsolicited video of himself to Miss A engaging in sexual intercourse with another woman whilst at work, had his trousers undone, put her hand on his erect penis over clothes and carried out a sex act in front of her. The tribunal said allegations of kissing, touching, taking out his penis in front of her and two allegations of penetration, all without consent, were not proved. Threats to disclose information to her husband, slamming a door to hit her arm were also not proved.
The tribunal said the doctor at some point knew Miss A was vulnerable, and said an allegation he told her she should visit a suicide booth – in reference to a scene in US cartoon series ‘Futurama’ – was also found proved. Abusing a more senior position and using his power over her were found not to be proved.
The doctor had already admitted engaging in oral sex in the GP surgery with another woman, known as Miss B, during working hours. Dr Plimmer also accepted having sexual intercourse with a further complainant, Miss C, during working hours, and earlier admitted sending another woman – Miss E – an unsolicited photo of his penis, taken whilst at work, on two different occasions. In a conversation with Miss D, it was also found proven he had threatened Miss F, saying “if that c**t takes me to the GMC I’ll slit her throat. I know where she lives” or words to that effect. He had already admitted many of the allegations were sexually motivated.
During the hearing, Dr Plimmer had tried to blame many of his actions on a ‘sex addiction’. He said seeking out sexual activity “felt like a need”, adding: “I did lie in order to get that need met, and I was not honest with people to get that need met But there was no sense of me enjoying this because I like lying, or it gives me power, or it gives me control, they were all byproducts of trying to meet my need.” He went on to say: “I am sincerely apologetic to everyone I’ve lied to, and the consequences it had towards patients and not being there to care for them. I feel immense shame for everything I did.”
The doctor was accused by Mark Monaghan, presenting the case on behalf of the General Medical Council, of “manipulating” people with “charms and lies and anything else in your armoury.” A total of six women had lodged complaints. Giving her evidence earlier in the tribunal, Miss A, told the hearing she would ‘bear the scars” for life after what she says he did to her. She said Dr Plimmer would only target “vulnerable” woman and claimed his perversions were all about “power.” Miss A argued everything she was said to have “consented” to was “coerced”, and added: “I was very compliant at the time. I don’t deny this, but how I ended up in that role is different,” she added. She said it was “no coincidence” he chose “vulnerable” victims to “amuse him.”
After delivering the verdict, the chair of the tribunal panel said: “This is a complicated outcome – the determination will be sent to parties but is not yet ready for publication. They will need time to read that material. The tribunal will be adjourned in any event to move to stage 2 for a date in April.” The tribunal was then adjourned until 22 April to move on to stage two.