December 27, 2024

SCOTUS rejects appeals from GOP, Trump over 2020 voting rules

SCOTUS #SCOTUS

On Location: Feb. 22, 2021

SHARE

SHARE

TWEET

SHARE

EMAIL

Click to expand

UP NEXT

UP NEXT

The Supreme Court has formally rejected several appeals from Republicans and former President Donald Trump over contested 2020 voting rules in key battleground states.

The court declined to take up a challenge to Pennsylvania’s mail ballot deadline extension that became the fixation of Republican attempts to overturn results in that state. The justices also turned away a case out of Georgia, brought by Trump ally Lin Wood, over mail-in ballot requirements.

a sign on the grass © Seth Herald/AFP via Getty Images, FILE MORE: Voting rights legislation across country looks to both restrict, expand access

And, the court rejected Trump’s suit against President Joe Biden over the counting of absentee ballots in Wisconsin.

a sign on the side of a building: Trump signs and Biden signs are seen near Eisenhower Elementary School a polling area in Flint, Mich., Nov. 3, 2020. © Seth Herald/AFP via Getty Images, FILE Trump signs and Biden signs are seen near Eisenhower Elementary School a polling area in Flint, Mich., Nov. 3, 2020.

While the election is obviously settled, many Republicans had hoped the justices would resolve the dispute over changes in voting rules promulgated by state courts or other non-elected bodies — changes they argue are illegal because they weren’t legislated.

MORE: Here’s how states have changed the rules around voting amid the coronavirus pandemic

“Now, the election is over, and there is no reason for refusing to decide the important question that these cases pose,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito in a dissent joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Justice Clarence Thomas, also dissenting from the decision in the Pennsylvania cases, wrote, the “decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future.”

“These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set election rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable,” Thomas wrote.

MORE: Election 2020: Why voting in the coronavirus pandemic will be unlike any other year

Leave a Reply