John Bercow defects to Labour with withering attack on Johnson
John Bercow #JohnBercow
John Bercow, the former Tory MP and Speaker of the House of Commons, today delivers an extraordinary broadside against Boris Johnson and the Conservative party as he announces he has switched his political allegiance to Labour.
In an explosive interview with the Observer, Bercow says he regards today’s Conservative party as “reactionary, populist, nationalistic and sometimes even xenophobic”.
Bercow, who stepped down as Speaker in 2019 after 10 years, says he joined the Labour party a few weeks ago because he now shares its values and sees it is as the only means to removing the current Tory government from office.
“I am motivated by support for equality, social justice and internationalism. That is the Labour brand,” he said. “The conclusion I have reached is that this government needs to be replaced. The reality is that the Labour party is the only vehicle that can achieve that objective. There is no other credible option.”
Bercow says that despite Johnson’s professed commitment to “levelling up”, he has no interest in those less privileged than himself. He also describes as “utterly shameful” the decision to cut international aid.
‘‘He is a successful campaigner but a lousy governor,” he said. “I don’t think he has any vision of a more equitable society, any thirst for social mobility or any passion to better the lot of people less fortunate than he is. I think increasingly people are sick of lies, sick of empty slogans, sick of a failure to deliver.’’
While Downing Street is likely to dismiss Bercow’s comments as those of an embittered remainer out for revenge because he has not been offered a peerage, as is customary for a retired Speaker, the news caps one of the most difficult weeks of Johnson’s premiership to date.
It is also marks the latest stage in an extraordinary political odyssey for Bercow, who joined the Tory party at 17 and describes himself as having once been a “rabid rightwinger”. By the early 2000s, Bercow had moved towards the more liberal, internationalist wing of the party. In 2009, when he became Speaker, convention dictated that he had to resign his party membership.
The Tories’ unexpected loss of the Chesham and Amersham parliamentary seat, where the Liberal Democrats overturned a majority of 16,000, has raised serious questions among Tory MPs and activists over whether Johnson can appeal both to working class voters behind the “red wall” and those in the more prosperous southern shires.
The result has already prompted signs of a U-turn in government over proposed changes in planning rules, which critics say would have reduced the right of people to appeal against development decisions. The issue was one of several that hit the Tory vote in Thursday’s byelection.
Video: Speaker John Bercow makes Commons remarks on Westminster bullying (The Independent)
Speaker John Bercow makes Commons remarks on Westminster bullying
SHARE
SHARE
TWEET
SHARE
Click to expand
UP NEXT
Referring to the byelection shock, Bercow said he believed many traditional Tories were dismayed by the Johnson government’s failure to match actions with words. He cited recent decisions to limit education catchup funding and to cut the international aid budget as examples of where its real priorities lay.
“I think what it [the byelection result] tells us is that there is very considerable distrust on the part of voters in the south of England of this government. I don’t accept the thesis that this was just an anti-HS2 vote. I think that is very convenient for the government, but it suffers from the disadvantage of being wrong. I think people in very large numbers are disappointed, in some cases disgusted, by what this government has done.”
Bercow, whose later period as Speaker was overshadowed by claims of bullying of staff, said he would not comment on “confidential” issues.
In his time as Speaker he grew increasingly controversial, and was detested by successive Tory prime ministers, who regarded his interventions over Brexit as self-aggrandising and verging on biased.
He reserved some of his most savage criticisms for the way the current government treats parliament, suggesting that he believes it consistently hides the truth from MPs.
“I regard the government’s treatment of parliament as a disgrace. I believe the truth matters. I believe parliament matters. And I believe that telling the truth in and to parliament matters. There is growing, extensive and incontrovertible evidence that the government is disrespecting parliament, telling untruths to parliament and bypassing parliament. That is wrong. Period. Some people may not immediately think that it matters. It does, but it is a slow-burn issue.”
Related: John Bercow: ‘I may be pompous and an irritant. But I am completely authentic’
Asked if he believed Labour could, under Keir Starmer, oust the Tories, Bercow was unsure. “The jury is out. I am, however, hopeful because I observed Keir Starmer at close quarters from the Speaker’s chair. He may not be Bill Clinton or Barack Obama but he is decent, honourable and intelligent and he came into politics as public service. I believe that Keir Starmer is motivated by an earnest and consuming desire to better the lot of the vast majority of the people of this country who do not enjoy the privileges that he does.”
On the possibility of being recommended for a peerage by the Labour leader he said: “There has been no such discussion and I have asked for no such thing. This isn’t about revenge. That is not what motivates me. My decision to join the Labour party is the result of a process going back months and indeed years. It isn’t a gambit and it isn’t a manoeuvre. It is a reflection of who I am and what I believe.”
Related: The blue wall: what next for the Tories after a shock byelection defeat?
He’s not the first Bercow to join the Labour party. His wife, Sally, has long been a member, and was once a Labour candidate for Westminster council.
In a sign of greater cooperation between the Lib Dems and Labour, Lib Dem leader Ed Davey gave a broad hint that his voters should back Labour in next month’s Batley byelection. “Political parties campaign where they can win,” he told the Observer.
“We thought we could win in Chesham and Amersham. Labour didn’t campaign very much. In Batley and Spen, we will have a presence – we’ve got councillors there. But we’re not going to be able to, frankly, pour in the resources that we put into Chesham and Amersham. Voters are far smarter than people give them credit for. Liberal Democrat voters may well notice that this is a Labour-held seat with the Tories in a close second, and they’ll draw their own conclusions. But that shouldn’t be stitched up in a back room by party leaders.”