November 10, 2024

Jack Eichel trade rumors: ‘Calls taken’ for Sabres star; Rangers reportedly interested

Eichel #Eichel

Jack could soon be out of the box in Buffalo.

Semi-retired NHL insider Bob McKenzie returned to the tweet machine on Monday to drop some fairly interesting news: Sabres center Jack Eichel may (or may not) want out of Buffalo, with the Sabres front office answering calls for his services.

McKenzie reports that Buffalo isn’t actively shopping Eichel, but that Eichel is “frustrated” with the lack of team success coming his way.

“I hear that (trade talk) a lot,” Eichel’s agent Peter Fish said, via McKenzie. “Jack wants to win, he’s frustrated (not winning) but, no, he doesn’t want out. Jack is preparing to head to Buffalo at some point here and prepare for the season, whenever that may be. That’s all he controls.”

McKenzie named the Rangers, who are at the top end of their organizational rebuild and showed flashes of being a competitive hockey team throughout the regular season, as an interested team. They currently hold the No. 1 overall pick in the 2020 NHL Draft, with wunderkind Alexis Lafreniere likely being selected with that pick.

2020 NHL DRAFT: When is it? | Who is Alexis Lafreniere?

McKenzie would finish up his tweet frenzy by reinforcing that this is just rumor and conjecture at the moment, but that calls were made, and all parties involved didn’t seem eager to move on or forward with a trade.

In a shortened NHL regular season, the 23-year-old netted a career-high 36 goals in 68 games and has been a subject of trade rumors in recent weeks following the Sabres shaking up their front office. New Buffalo GM Kevyn Adams probably won’t part with the elite center without a big-time package involving picks, prospects and proven talent.

Eichel’s contract, in which he’ll earn $10 million per year through 2026, also is a prohibitive factor in trade talks, as well.

Still, the surprising, supposed, legitimate rumor from McKenzie sparked discussion (and heated reaction) on Twitter:

Leave a Reply