Bruce Lehrmann defamation trial live: Brittany Higgins cries in court saying ‘I was so scared’ after suggestion she lied about rape
Brittany #Brittany
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
What we heard today
Brittany Higgins returned to the witness box on Thursday afternoon in the defamation case against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson.
It was an at-times emotional and heated afternoon, with Higgins pushing back during cross-examination by Steve Whybrow SC.
Just a reminder: The case is over an interview aired on Ten’s The Project, in which Higgins alleged she was raped by a Liberal staffer in Parliament House. Network Ten and Wilkinson are defending the case.
Bruce Lehrmann has denied raping Higgins and pleaded not guilty to a charge of sexual intercourse without consent. His criminal trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct and the second did not proceed due to prosecutors’ fears for Higgins’ mental health.
Brittany Higgins leaves the federal court in Sydney this afternoon. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
Here’s what we heard on Thursday afternoon at the defamation case:
Whybrow, who also cross-examined Higgins at the criminal trial, suggested to Higgins that she lied about being raped to save her job after she was found passed out in the minister’s personal suite. Higgins said that was “insulting and it’s incorrect” and said her job was “not that important”.
Higgins admitted lying to police about seeing a doctor, and said it was because she was embarrassed that she had not, and that days after the alleged assault, a rape kit would not be of much use.
Whybrow put to Higgins that she told police that she had drunk about four gin and tonics despite telling the court that she was only having vodka, lime and soda, or Diet Coke and vodka. Higgins said she didn’t think the gin and tonics thing was true, and said she thought police made a mistake as she doesn’t really drink tonic water due to the calories in it.
Higgins passionately defended herself from accusations that she was inconsistent about whether she was naked or her dress was around her waist. “As I was being raped, it wasn’t my primary concern where my dress was … I was deeply more concerned about the penis in my vagina that I didn’t want than I was about my dress,” she told the court.
Higgins said she got elements of her story wrong about the morning after the alleged assault, saying: “In those moments of trauma, my memory wasn’t perfect.”
To read everything that was said this morning, click here.
Higgins is due to continue being cross-examined on Friday.
Updated at 01.47 EST
Higgins says she would ‘never intentionally give false evidence, especially in this context’
The court has adjourned for the day after a session which saw Brittany Higgins refuting suggestions by Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister, Steve Whybrow, that she gave false evidence at the criminal trial in the ACT last year.
Whybrow put it to her that her account of events at Lehrmann’s trial differed from testimony she has given to the federal court in this defamation trial.
Whybrow: “And what I’m suggesting to you is that you intentionally gave false evidence to try and explain away a damning email that is inconsistent with your claims that you were sexually assaulted by Mr Lehrmann.”
Higgins: “I would never intentionally give false evidence, especially in this context.”
Higgins said her answers may have varied as to times and dates because memory is imperfect and she was traumatised.
One discrepancy she was questioned about was an email she sent to Lehrmann after the alleged rape and on the day he was fired asking for his help with a work task.
Higgins said she sent the email with the phrase “I am phoning a friend” because she was “in denial” about the alleged rape and she was just doing her job.
Updated at 01.06 EST
Higgins tells court accusation she lied about rape to keep job is ‘insulting’ and ‘incorrect’
Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister, Steve Whybrow, has suggested to Brittany Higgins that she was found passed out drunk in the minister’s personal suite and she lied about being raped to save her job.
Whybrow said: “And you didn’t have sex with anybody that night you passed out drunk in the minister’s personal suite. That’s correct, isn’t it?”
Higgins replied: “It’s insulting and it’s incorrect, but you’re entitled to your opinion … My job is not that important.”
Whybrow then asked: “The first time you made any allusion to anything, potentially non-consensual or unwanted, or even involving Mr Lehrmann, in a personal sense, was on the Thursday [after the alleged rape on Saturday morning]. You disagree with that?”
Higgins replied: “I told [chief of staff] Fiona Brown on the Tuesday; I told [friend] Ben Dillaway on the Tuesday. I didn’t tell my Dad but I did say something serious had happened but I told two people on the Tuesday and on the Wednesday.”
Higgins said the reason she lied to police that she had been to see a doctor was because she was embarrassed that she had not and days later doing a rape kit would not be of much use.
Whybrow said: “And the reason you didn’t go to a doctor, like you told Mr Dillaway, and like you indicated to Ms Brown that you were going to and like you told the police that you had, was because you hadn’t actually been sexually assaulted the week before.
Higgins breaking down in tears: “That’s incorrect. I didn’t have a support system, I was by myself in Canberra, I had no one around me, I was so scared.”
The court has adjourned for a short break because Ten’s barrister, Matt Collins, said he was concerned for Higgins’ welfare who was sobbing in the witness box.
Brittany Higgins at the federal court in Sydney, where she is testifying in the Bruce Lehrmann defamation trial. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
Updated at 01.36 EST
Higgins admits lying to police that she had gone to a doctor after alleged rape
Brittany Higgins is being cross-examined about what she described as a meet and greet that she gave police officers a week after her alleged rape on 1 April 2019.
Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister, Steve Whybrow SC, said they took notes of the meeting.
Whybrow said she told police she drank four gin and tonics on the night before her alleged rape.
Whybrow asked: “Would you have said that you drank four gin and tonics?”
Higgins replied: “Potentially, but gin and tonics aren’t my drink so it seems unlikely.”
Whybrow said: “Well, you’ve given fairly strong evidence that you were only having vodka, lime and soda or Diet Coke and vodka in your evidence yesterday.”
Higgins replied: “That’s correct.”
Whybrow said: “I want to suggest to you that what you told the police on the first of April, a week later, was that you drank about four gin and tonics.”
Higgins replied: “I don’t think the gin and tonics thing is true. I think they maybe made a mistake because I really don’t drink tonic water because it has calories in it. I wouldn’t have said that and I wouldn’t have drank gin and tonic.”
Higgins agreed that she told police “a lie” that she had been to a doctor after she was allegedly raped but she made appointments and didn’t go. “I admit that.”
Updated at 23.48 EST
A warning for readers: this blog contains graphic details of allegations of sexual assault.
Information and support for anyone affected by rape or sexual abuse issues is available in Australia at 1800Respect (1800 737 732).
Higgins tells court ‘as I was being raped, it wasn’t my primary concern where my dress was’
Brittany Higgins has passionately defended herself during cross-examination from accusations that she was inconsistent about whether she was naked or her dress was around her waist.
She broke down in tears as she told the court she was more concerned about being raped than she was about where her dress was.
She told the federal court she felt violated when she found out that a female security guard had given an interview to Four Corners about finding her naked on a couch but she accepts the guard was correct that she was naked.
Until the security guard told the ABC she was completely naked, she had believed that the dress was scrunched up around her waist.
As I was being raped, it wasn’t my primary concern where my dress was … I was deeply more concerned about the penis in my vagina that I didn’t want than I was about my dress.
I wasn’t concerned about my dress in that moment. But the next morning when I woke up and vomited into the toilet, the first thing I did wasn’t [to think] ‘where’s my dress? Is it on my body or is it on the ground?’
Brittany Higgins outside the federal court in Sydney. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
Updated at 01.37 EST
Higgins says: ‘In those moments of trauma, my memory wasn’t perfect’
Brittany Higgins has returned to the witness box after a lunch break to recommence her cross-examination by Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister, Steve Whybrow SC.
She agreed with Whybrow that what she told Channel Ten in a recorded interview about what woke her up on the morning after the alleged rape was not correct because “I was highly traumatised”.
The court was played an excerpt from the interview in which Higgins said she woke up when the security guards yelled into the office where she was asleep on the couch.
“Yeah, yes, that’s what I said. But I don’t believe that’s true now,” Higgins said.
Whybrow asked: “The reason you don’t believe it’s true is because, having reverse-engineered other evidence, it doesn’t fit with all the things you’ve said. Is that correct?”
Higgins told the court she believed at the time that what she said to Ten was true, but she knows now that her memory isn’t perfect and she got elements of her story wrong due to trauma.
“My memory was jogged by other evidence and I have I accept that it’s true,” Higgins said.
“I realised that in those moments of trauma, my memory wasn’t perfect. I remember them [the security guards] calling into the office.
“Just it’s the subsequent order in which these things happened when I was so hungover and almost vomiting into the minister’s bathroom, that now with the hindsight of other evidence, I accept, but that sober mind recollection is better than my own.”
Updated at 23.02 EST
What Brittany Higgins has said so far this morning
Brittany Higgins was back in the witness box on Thursday morning in the defamation case against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson.
The case is over an interview aired on Ten’s The Project, in which Higgins alleged she was raped by a Liberal staffer in Parliament House. Network Ten and Wilkinson are defending the case.
Lisa Wilkinson arrives at the federal court in Sydney this morning. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
Bruce Lehrmann has denied raping Higgins and pleaded not guilty to a charge of sexual intercourse without consent. His criminal trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct and the second did not proceed due to prosecutors’ fears for Higgins’ mental health.
Here’s what we’ve heard so far today at the defamation trial:
Higgins said she was told in October 2019 that there had been a media inquiry about a sexual assault in Senator Linda Reynolds’ office. At the time she was working for Senator Michaelia Cash, who assured Higgins “she would make the media inquiry go away”.
Higgins said she was relieved when she heard Lehrmann was going to deny all sexual contact with her because she was afraid Lehrmann would claim it was consensual sex, which she believed would be “preposterous”.
Under cross-examination from Steve Whybrow SC, who also cross-examined her at the criminal trial, Higgins said she thought she was telling the truth during the criminal trial, but said she was “just not always correct. But I was always doing my best.”
Higgins admitted under cross-examination that when she said she had been locked in a bathroom having a panic attack for three hours, she was incorrect. Higgins said it was not three hours, but it felt like a long time.
Whybrow put to Higgins that she “alter and evolve your evidence as you find that extra information”. Higgins said that her memory was imperfect, but said “I know what happened during that day”.
Higgins was challenged over a book she has been contracted to write, and whether it affected her evidence in the defamation trial. She said if she ever writes a book, she will donate all the money to charity – and the book contract has been put on pause.
Higgins will continue being cross-examined this afternoon.
Updated at 23.21 EST
Court takes a lunch break
Bruce Lehrmann leaves the federal court in Sydney during the lunch break. Photograph: Dean Lewins/AAP
Brittany Higgins has left the witness box while the court takes a lunch break until 2.15pm on what will be her second full day of evidence in the federal court.
Higgins has spent much of the morning facing a cross-examination by Bruce Lehrmann’s barrister Steve Whybrow SC.
Lehrmann has brought a defamation case against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson over an interview with Higgins on Ten’s The Project in which she alleged she was raped by a Liberal staffer in Parliament House. Network Ten and Wilkinson are defending the case.
Uncertainty remains around the continuation of the federal court YouTube live stream after Justice Michael Lee warned if members of the public denigrate the barristers and the witnesses he will shut down the feed.
Updated at 23.18 EST
Judge warns he may stop live stream if social media commenters abuse lawyers
Justice Michael Lee has warned if members of the public denigrate the barristers on social media he will reconsider allowing the case to be livestreamed on YouTube.
Lee heard that court staff were monitoring activity on X, formerly known as Twitter.
“I just make it perfectly clear to those observing that abuse of any legal practitioners involved in the case, it won’t be tolerated,” Lee said.
“And if the situation becomes one which I consider the benefits of livestreaming are outweighed by the fact that it’s encouraging activity which I regard undermines the integrity of the process then I’ll cease the live stream.”
In the interests of open justice the federal court has allowed a live stream of proceedings on YouTube, despite an objection by Ten.
“Network Ten’s asserted concerns for Mr Lehrmann’s right to a fair trial are misdirected. Mr Lehrmann’s preference is for the hearing to be livestreamed,” Lee said in his ruling last week at the start of the trial.
Updated at 21.17 EST
Court shown separate plans of Linda Reynolds’ office annotated by Higgins and Lehrmann
The court is hearing cross-examination about when Brittany Higgins woke up in Parliament House after the alleged rape.
Separately, two plans of Senator Reynolds’ office were submitted in evidence and released yesterday publicly by the court, one annotated by Higgins:
Exhibit showing ministerial suite M1 23 – with Brittany Higgins’ markings. Photograph: Federal court of Australia
and one annotated by Bruce Lehrmann:
Exhibit showing ministerial suite M1 23 – with Bruce Lehrmann’s markings. Photograph: Federal court of Australia
Updated at 20.55 EST
Higgins says writing book has been put on hold due to legal cases
Brittany Higgins has told the federal court if she ever writes a book she will donate all the money to charity.
Asked if she has a financial interest in the outcome of the defamation proceedings Higgins said: “I declare it now, if I ever actually finish the book, I will donate [the outstanding contractual sum of $216,667] to charity. I don’t care about the money.
“Take it as an oath right now. I don’t care about it.”
Higgins told the court she did sign a book contract but it has been put on pause due to all the legal cases she is involved in.
Higgins said the defamation case took primacy over writing a book.
“It’s tentatively on hold but I have no idea if it may happen one day but also I don’t ever want to do this again.”
Updated at 20.22 EST