Albanese rejects Dutton’s call to legislate Indigenous voice before referendum

Anthony Albanese has rejected the opposition leader’s call for the Indigenous voice to be legislated before a referendum is held and warned against appealing to “fear rather than hope” during the debate.

The prime minister on Tuesday also rejected claims by Tony Abbott that the consultative body amounted to a form of “co-governance”.

Albanese urged Australians to back constitutional change – the model “Indigenous people themselves have said they want” via the 2017 Uluru statement.

The opposition leader, Peter Dutton, released a letter on Sunday demanding more detail on the proposed voice. He accused Albanese of “treating people like mugs” for holding a referendum primarily on the principle of its establishment.

Dutton suggested the body could be legislated first to show its effectiveness but Albanese said on Tuesday he was “not proposing that”.

“That was a position that some in the Morrison government were taking, I’m not quite sure what his [Dutton’s] position is at the moment,” the prime minister told 2GB radio.

“But the fact is Indigenous people themselves have said that they want the voice enshrined in the constitution. Now, the details of how it operates will be subject to legislation – that’s the whole point.

“Over a period of time, the success of the voice will be determined by the capacity of the parliament to enact laws [for its function] … because the voice isn’t above the parliament, it’s subservient to it.”

Albanese said the status quo was not working, citing the massive gaps in Indigenous and non-Indigenous incarceration rates, educational outcomes and life expectancy.

Albanese’s position has also come under fire from Abbott – a former Liberal prime minister – who wants acknowledgment of Indigenous people in the constitution without the consultative body being enshrined.

“This is so much more than recognition, it’s really about governance,” Abbott said last week. “It’s getting towards co-governance of the sort which is being moved towards in New Zealand with the Maori people.”

New Zealand’s parliament has reserved seats for Maori representatives – unlike the voice proposal for a separate body that would be consulted but could not determine legislative outcomes.

Sign up to Guardian Australia’s Morning Mail

Our Australian morning briefing email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Albanese said he “doesn’t question the fact” Abbott cares about the gap in Indigenous outcomes but rejected his characterisation of Labor’s proposal.

“The fact is this is not a co-governance model … at all. It’s subservient to the parliament,” he said.

Albanese said a loss at the referendum, which Labor plans to hold in the second half of 2023, would send “a bad message” about reconciliation and affect “the way Australia is perceived internationally”.

Albanese noted “it’s a lot easier to appeal to fear rather than hope”.

On ABC’s 7.30 on Monday, Albanese said the government wanted the referendum process to be “inclusive” and “people can either look for a way in which this can be given support or they can look for reasons to disagree and look for division”.

Albanese said he was “disappointed” Dutton had briefed media about his concerns rather than being “fair dinkum” and coming up with “a constructive proposal”.