Ref’s take: Erling Haaland’s penalty kick, what to make of VAR decisions in Dortmund-Sevilla Champions League
Haaland #Haaland
In a rare scenario that will go down in the books for the football community, Massimiliano Irrati, the video assistant referee for Borussia Dortmund’s 2-2 draw against Sevilla in the second leg of the UEFA Champions League round of 16 (Dortmund advanced 5-4 on aggregate), found himself in a situation where his vast VAR experience was put to work during a six-minute span. And we all got an education in advanced VAR usage.
Three VAR recommendations were given to head referee Cuneyt Cakır, who disallowed a goal, awarded a penalty kick and yellow card, and had the penalty retaken.
You can watch the replay of the match on Paramount+, and my video breakdown of the calls at the top of the article. Let’s break everything down for you.
Haaland’s disallowed goal
So let’s begin where everyone got lost.
It’s important to note that under VAR process, Irrati was first required to show Cakir the foul committed by Haaland on Fernando because if Cakir did not agree with the recommendation that a foul occurred, then Haaland’s goal would have stood and that would have been the end of the VAR discussion.
Penalty kick and yellow card
Once referee Cakir disallowed the goal, the next step would be to check the potential penalty kick with Haaland and Kounde.
Penalty retake Sevilla keeper Yassine Bounou did not keep his feet on the goal line when he saved the initial penalty kick taken by Erling Haaland. Getty Images
This brings us to the easiest of the VAR recommendations: A retake of the penalty kick.
How far back can VAR go to review plays?
The period of play that a VAR is able to review is called “the attacking phase of play,” also known as APP, which leads directly to the decision/incident being reviewed and can include how the attacking team gained possession of the ball in open play. Once a play has restarted, the APP resets and a VAR would not be able to review/check an incident unless there is a case of mistaken identity for misconducts or a potential sending off offense related to violent conduct, spitting, biting, or an extremely offensive, insulting and/or abusive gestures.
Situations like this are rare in the sport. A double VAR review is like finding a unicorn at the end of the rainbow with a pot of gold next to it. Barely does it happen where there is such immediacy of time in which two reviews are necessary (approximately a minute between each incident) and the referee was not able to stop live play in neutral zone/situation after the initial penalty decision in the 47th minute to avoid the second review in the 48th minute.
It was excellent work by the officials to stay focused on the details of the process in this rare scenario, one we usually only get to talk about as a hypothetical during VAR training. The clean use of the VAR process resulted in the correct decisions by the officiating team under the high level of pressure and magnitude of the round of 16 in Champions League. It reinforces that some of the best referees in the world work in the Champions League and make incredibly difficult scenarios look easy to the football world.