September 21, 2024

Mike Lee objects to anecdote, prompting a confusing end to 2nd day of Trump trial

Mike Lee #MikeLee

Mike Lee wearing a suit and tie talking on a cell phone: In this image from video, Sen. Mike Lee speaks during the second impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday. © Senate Television via AP In this image from video, Sen. Mike Lee speaks during the second impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on Wednesday night objected to the portrayal of an accidental phone call from then-President Donald Trump, plunging the Senate chamber into confusion on the second day of Trump’s impeachment trial.

Rising as Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the lead House manager, moved to end discussion until Thursday, Lee asked that a characterization of the call be stricken from the record, contending that it was inaccurate.

Trump called Lee on Jan. 6, the day of the Capitol insurrection, but had meant to call Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) to corral support for his election disputes. Lee himself recounted the call to the Deseret News last month and said he had passed off the phone to Tuberville when he realized Trump had dialed him by mistake.

House impeachment managers cited the call during their presentation on Wednesday, but Lee said the characterization they provided was untrue.

Video: ‘Unprepared and incompetent’: Senator criticizes Trump’s defense (MSNBC)

‘Unprepared and incompetent’: Senator criticizes Trump’s defense

SHARE

SHARE

TWEET

SHARE

EMAIL

Click to expand

UP NEXT

UP NEXT

The chamber grew tense as Lee and Democratic leadership began heatedly arguing over the nature of Lee’s request and how to proceed according to Senate rules.

Eventually, Raskin returned to the lectern and agreed to withdraw the anecdote. He added that Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), one of the managers, was merely reading from a media report of the call when he brought it up, but that the anecdote was not worth defending further.

“This is much ado about nothing because it’s not critical in any way to our case,” Raskin said.

The Senate then adjourned for the evening.

Leave a Reply