Dominic Raab quits with swipe at ‘Kafkaesque’ saga after bullying report found he ‘insulted and intimidated’ officials
Kafkaesque #Kafkaesque
21 April 2023, 12:45 | Updated: 21 April 2023, 12:48
Defiant Dominic Raab launched a furious fightback after quitting as deputy prime minister following a bombshell report into claims he bullied civil servants.
The former justice secretary slammed what he called a “Kafkaesque saga” for which the British people would pay the price, adding that the investigation had set a “playbook for a small number of officials to target ministers”.
His article in the Telegraph came after a furious resignation letter in which he claimed the inquiry’s findings were “flawed” and created a dangerous precedent by setting the threshold for bullying “so low”.
Adam Tolley KC’s independent probe – which covered 15 claims since 2018, during his stins as Brexit secretary, foreign secretary and justice secretary, cleared him of several allegations of bad behaviour, including findings that he did not swear or use physical gestures to threaten.
But it found he was “intimidating” in the context of a work meeting.
The findings landed on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s desk on Thursday morning, but the results were not initially revealed.
Read more: Read in full: Dominic Raab’s furious resignation letter to the prime minister
Despite criticism overnight, including from his own ministers, over Mr Sunak’s delay in deciding his fate, No 10 sources said the prime minister did not tell his deputy to resign.
In his Telegraph article, Raab wrote: “The British public expect ministers to exercise rigorous oversight over officials to prevent democratic mandates being unpicked, raise the game of underperforming parts of government, and prevent Whitehall from squandering taxpayers’ money.
“Likewise, ministers should be held to the same standards as everyone else.
“In reality, the Kafkaesque saga I endured was shorn of the safeguards most people enjoy.”
He added: “The inquiry accepted that I had not personalised my criticism, nor intended to upset anyone, and was unaware of the offence caused. That was never my intention, and I am genuinely sorry if my actions had that effect on anyone.
Read more: Furious Dominic Raab quits with blast at civil servants after bullying probe upholds two complaints
“The inquiry concluded that I had not been notified of any particular conduct, before formal complaints were submitted, nor had anyone suggested my behaviour could amount to bullying.
“This precedent sets the playbook for a small number of officials to target ministers, who negotiate robustly on behalf of the country, pursue bold reforms and persevere in holding civil servants to account.
“If that is now the threshold for bullying in government, it is the people of this country who will pay the price.”
If that is now the threshold for bullying in government, it is the people of this country who will pay the price.
Mr Raab said he was “subject to trial by media for six months” and human resources standards he said would be found “in any other workplace” were not applied to him.
He argued in his separate resignation letter to Rishi Sunak that the inquiry set the “threshold for bullying so low” that it could “encourage spurious complaints against ministers, and have a chilling effect on those driving change on behalf of your government – and ultimately the British people”.
He also took aim at what he called “systematic leaking of skewed and fabricated claims” he said breached the inquiry’s rules and the Civil Service code of conduct.
The report concluded “he acted in a way which was intimidating, in the sense of unreasonably and persistently aggressive conduct in the context of a work meeting”.
“It also involved an abuse or misuse of power in a way that undermines or humiliates. He introduced an unwarranted punitive element,” the report said.
It added that while meeting policy officials, Mr Raab “acted in a manner which was intimidating, in the sense of going further than was necessary or appropriate in delivering critical feedback, and also insulting, in the sense of making unconstructive critical comments about the quality of work done (whether or not as a matter of substance any criticism was justified)”.
He found Mr Raab “complained about the absence of what he referred to as ‘basic information’ or ‘the basics’, about ‘obstructiveness’ on the part of officials whom he perceived to be resistant to his policies, and described some work as ‘utterly useless’ and ‘woeful'”.
Mr Tolley said he conveyed a threat to a civil servant by referencing the Civil Service code of conduct that had “a significant adverse effect on a particular individual who took it seriously” during his time as foreign secretary.
“The DPM’s conduct was a form of intimidating behaviour, in the sense of conveying a threat of unspecified disciplinary action, and was experienced as such,” he wrote.
“He did not target any individual, nor intend to threaten anyone with disciplinary action. However, he ought to have realised that his reference to the Civil Service Code could well have been understood as a threat.”
James O’Brien and Andrew Marr discuss Raab’s resignation
assiduously and typically from about 7.30(am) to about 10(pm) Monday to Thursday,” Adam Tolley KC said.
The report said Mr Raab described his style as “inquisitorial, direct, impatient and fastidious”, and that he typically works from 7.30am to 10pm Monday to Thursday.
It said Mr Raab believed once a decision on policy is taken, it should not be revisited by civil servants.
But he was cleared of making physical gestures in a threatening way, with Mr Tolley writing that the most extreme claim given was him putting his hand out to a person’s face to stop them talking.
He also cleared Mr Raab of shouting and swearing at staff, saying he “did not swear at any individual or swear more generally”.