Labor to move official censure of Scott Morrison in parliament over secret ministries scandal

The federal Labor government will move to censure Scott Morrison over his multiple secret ministries scandal, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, saying the push to reprimand his predecessor was important for the accountability of Australia’s democratic system.

Albanese’s cabinet has endorsed all the recommendations of Virginia Bell’s inquiry and will this week introduce legislation to formalise the publication of ministerial arrangements.

“The house will be moving a censure motion in the member for Cook as a result of the findings of Virginia Bell and the inquiry, which found that the actions of the former prime minister fundamentally undermined the principles of responsible government,” Albanese told a press conference on Monday.

“Because the former prime minister wasn’t responsible to the parliament, and through the parliament to the electors, to the departments that he was appointed to administer.”

With Labor’s majority in the House of Representatives and Greens support the motion is expected to pass.

The government charged Bell, the former high court justice, to investigate the arrangements around Morrison’s secret appointments to administer the departments of health, industry, treasury, home affairs and finance in 2020 and 2021. It received Bell’s report on Friday, and her recommendations were considered by cabinet on Monday.

Albanese said either attorney-general Mark Dreyfus or leader of the house Tony Burke would move the motion this week.

The exact wording of the formal censure motion has not been detailed, but Albanese cited the central findings of the Bell report that Morrison’s secret appointments had “real consequences of acting it to undermine public confidence in government and were corrosive of trust in government”.

Earlier on Monday the manager of opposition business, Paul Fletcher, indicated the Coalition will oppose the censure because neither Bell nor the solicitor general had found any “illegality or unconstitutionality” in what Morrison had done.

Fletcher told Sky News changes to require require disclosure of ministerial appointments were “perfectly sensible” and the Coalition is “likely to support that”.

But he argued the censure motion was “purely about political payback”, labelling it a “political stunt”.

“If they do decide to proceed with the censure motion, bear in mind it’s very, very unusual to bring a censure motion against a backbencher as Scott Morrison now is.”

“The issue of the relationship between the then prime minister and his then ministers, that’s a matter for the prime minister and each of those ministers.”

Sign up to Guardian Australia’s Afternoon Update

Our Australian afternoon update email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter

Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Albanese labelled that remark “extraordinary”, arguing the issue is “not a personal relationship between two mates over what happened down at the pub”.

“This is about accountability of our democratic system, and whether the parliament was functioning properly. And about the relationship between the prime minister and the people of Australia, who expect to be held to account through our parliamentary processes.”

The Greens leader, Adam Bandt, told reporters in Canberra that his party supports “action being taken in the parliament against Scott Morrison”.

“What we want to see is real, meaningful action taken,” he said, noting that the Greens had attempted to refer Morrison to the privileges committee for investigation.

Albanese has previously accused Morrison of misleading parliament, while the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, has said there should be “severe political consequences” for the member for Cook.

In a statement on Friday afternoon, Morrison said he had acted to “best advance and protect Australia’s national interests”, explaining that the decisions to take on extra powers “were taken during an extremely challenging period, where there was a need for considerable urgency”.

“I am pleased that this matter has now concluded and I can continue, as I have since the last election, to serve the people of Cook as their federal member of parliament.”